Even though all of the above reasons may be critical pull factors, we could safely lean towards option B, <em>higher wages</em>, as the most indicative answer. Mexicans did not necessarily get better jobs than they had back in their native country, where they may even have been skilled and educated professionals; in fact, wages may have been significantly higher in comparison to their earnings at home, allowing them for having a better quality of life and affording medical care, which tends to be expensive in the USA. Education is not necessarily free -especially at its highest levels, which would help migrants and their offspring to still further improve their quality of life- but then again, higher wages could open the possibility of accessing some private higher education.
Answer:
There was a local water supply for drinking, washing, cooking and transport. dry land, so that people could build on areas that don't flood. a defendable site, eg a hilltop or river bend, to protect from attackers. good farm land with fertile soils, so people could grow crops.
Explanation:
Hope this helps! <3
Answer:
Germany’s offer of land posed a direct threat to the United States.
hope this helps :)
Answer:
So every citizen could speak their mind and vote at a large assembly that's met to create laws.
Explanation:
<span>According to Gordon Allport, intergroup contact is likely to reduce prejudice when group members engage in competitive tasks. This theory makes sense, when people have to compete for something in their home life or work life, they tend to think of things being more fair when there is a competition held to achieve the winning. There is so many prejudice in the work environment now-a-days that it is hard to have employees understand why decisions are rightfully made. </span>
