Answer:
"Burglary (entering a building with the intent to commit a crime inside) and larceny (theft) are two different crimes, although burglaries are often committed for the purpose of theft. Burglary laws are intended to protect the sanctity and privacy of people's homes and other structures."
"Most people associate both terms with theft. But as it turns out, burglary occurs when a person enters a building for the purpose of committing a crime. ... Robbery, on the other hand, means that an assailant is forcing or threatening to force another person to give up something."
"Larceny (Theft)
To commit the crime of larceny, also known as theft, petty theft, or grand theft, a person must take someone else’s property without permission and with the intention to permanently deprive the owner of its use or possession. A theft may occur during the course of a burglary, but it can also occur as a separate incident. For example, shoplifting is theft, as is taking milk money from a schoolmate's backpack."
<h3><u>
Brainliest Please!</u></h3>
According to the Supreme Court of the United States, the duration of the delay, the causes of the delay, the appellant's assertion of the right to a prompt review and appeal, and prejudice are the four (4) criteria that should be taken into consideration by the courts.
<h3>What was the decision of the Supreme Court in Barker v. Wingo?</h3>
Held: The defendant's constitutional right to a speedy trial cannot be established by any rigid criteria; rather, it can only be evaluated on an as-needed basis by weighing the prosecution's and the defendant's actions.
<h3>What does Barker v. Wingo 1972 signify?</h3>
The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, specifically the right of defendants, was the subject of the United States Supreme Court case Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972).
To know more about U.S. Supreme Court visit:-
brainly.com/question/224703
#SPJ4
Answer:
Ride with the flow of traffic
Explanation:
Exceptions may apply in Arizona, Indiana, Massachusetts, North Dakota, and Oklahoma, where laws merely encourage but don't require riding with the flow of traffic.
Answer:
The protester can constitutionally be convicted for frustrated arson since he only lit and burnt the tool.
Explanation:
Arson can be destructive. As a crime, arson is grievous and hateful. There is inherent and manifest wickedness in committing arson, which is a federal crime. Destructive arson carries a life sentence. The protest looks like a desperate demonstration of unsound mental health. However, the protester will be convicted for frustrated arson, which carries a reduced sentence.
Answer: The 10th Amendment
Explanation: