Answer:
Landed in South America.
Sailed in the Atlantic ocean.
Explanation:
period sis
Answer:
The Ottoman Empire was the most religiously diverse empire in Europe and Asia. Macedonia, the southernmost Balkan regions and Asia Minor, which formed historically and in the minds of late Ottoman elites the territorial core of the empire, housed large groups of Christians and a significant number of Jews. Religious diversity characterized the core regions of the Islamic empire. Struck by an existential crisis beginning in the late 18th century, the Ottoman state undertook reforms, declared the equality of its subjects, willingly maintained its diversity and even institutionalised the cultural and religious autonomies which it had given its Christian and Jewish communities. When the Ottoman state failed to defend its territory and sovereignty, the Young Turk Committee of Union and Progress (CUP), the revolutionary rulers who gained power in a coup, finally decided on a program of national homogenization in Asia Minor which it carried out in 1914-1918. The CUP classified the Ottoman populations and dealt with them through resettlement, dispersion, expulsion and destruction – depending on the populations' assimilability into a Turko-Muslim nation in the Anatolian core. It judged the Muslims, in particular the Kurds, assimilable, but the Christian groups non-assimilable.
Explanation:
Community corrections officials in South Africa face several problems when monitoring offenders in communities such as:
- Lack of manpower
- Lying by community members
- Danger to correctio official
Community correction officials are tasked with monitoring offenders who were not put in jail by the Court but were instead ordered to serve their sentence in communities by doing certain things.
In South Africa, some challenges these officials might face include:
- Lack of manpower - because of high crime rates in South Africa, corrections officials may be assigned to too many offenders which would reduce the effectiveness of their monitoring.
- Lies by community members - members of the community might lie to protect offenders when they commit fresh crimes or fail to do what the courts instructed them to do so that the offenders do not end up in jail.
- Danger to correction official - South Africa has seen its fair share of violence against law enforcement officials. Corrections officials going into the community to monitor offenders can therefore put them at risk of being harmed by criminals in the community.
In conclusion, community corrections programs might have certain advantages but they can present various challenges to officials.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/3043600.</em>
