"<span>(B)Often money cannot be borrowed quickly and easily during an emergency" is the best answer, but another reason is that loans are charged interest, while savings are not. </span>
Life expectancy around the year 1800 was only about 36 years, so "middle age" (or median of lifespans) would be only about 17 or 18 years of age. By the time young people reached their late teens, they typically were expected to be working, married and carrying adult responsibilities.
Those life expectancy numbers can be a little misleading, though. A main reason that average life expectancy was only in the mid-30s is because infant mortality rates were very high. For persons who survived their childhood into adulthood, there was a good chance they lived to a much older age than 30-something.
I think the answer is d because if the majority rules then a lot of people want them as cabinet members and are more likely to value their advise. Hope this helped!
In my view, environmental changes often lead to global migration, because people need particular conditions to live. So the most suitable option is: <span>A. Environmental changes forced people to migrate to other areas. The number of environment migrants still grows and by 2050, in about 200 million people will leave their homes because of environmental changes.</span>
To protect our national interest and provide defence. The us was neutral at the time and aircraft didn't exist. The navy proved itself in the Quasi wars
