A few years ago I had an English teacher that encouraged "The Oreo Method"; it compares effective constructive criticism to an Oreo cookie.
The filling in the middle was the constructive criticism, but before and after that, you offer positive feedback for the writer.
Pretty self explanatory:
1. Provide one piece of positive feedback first and linger on it for a couple sentences; let them know how important that "thing" is and, in a way, praise them for doing it. This primes them to accept your feedback cause they know how thoroughly you've read and analyzed their work.
2. Offer any and all of the constructive criticism you have; stay subtle and be concise with all your feedback.
3. Offer more positive feedback, as many good things as you can come up with.
By submerging the constructive criticism between positive feedback, you keep their hopes up while still thoroughly conveying weak spots in their work.
I hope this kinda made sense; it's a very self explanatory idea so I had trouble elaborating on it.
I think Its Simile iont know fs
Answer:
The book may be introductory, but it can satisfy a scholar.
Explanation:
In any argument presentation be it in an academic paper or any book for that matter, the presence of any phrases like "sound lines' ' will show an emphasis on the fact that the presented argument is to a certain extent, true and has validation. At the same time, the words "amply provide" will imply that the sources or argument presented is enough to prove the given point. These two phrases thus, help make the argument that the given points may be introductory but at the same time, they can also satisfy a scholar's viewpoint.
Answer:
tips on how to balance fun and academics in high school
Explanation:
