The answer is <u>"funcitonalism".</u>
Functionalism interprets each piece of society as far as how it adds to the solidness of the entire society. Society is more than the total of its parts; rather, each piece of society is utilitarian for the solidness of the entirety. As per functionalism, an establishment exists since it serves an imperative part in the working of society. On the off chance that it never again serves a part, a foundation will fade away. At the point when new needs develop or rise, new establishments will be made to meet them.
La revolución industrial trajo nuevos inventos y tecnología a América.
<u>Answer:
</u>
Favoring the argument by Rigterink and Louzecky, deciding to not teach virtues to students would be a bad decision.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- Though the argument put up by Rigterink and Louzecky can be deemed to be true to a certain extent, it would be unintelligent to bring it into practice with students because if the students are not taught virtues, the rate of inclination towards bad and unethical behavior would increase.
- It definitely is difficult to bring virtues into practice, but that does not mean that they should not be inculcated on the minds of the students.
This is a tricky question, since it depends what usage of the words is meant, but the best answer is: a fact.
He is treating the topic of whether the global warming is real or not and all our evidence strongly points to the fact that it is, in fact, real.
In the common usage of the word, we are talking about a fact - the best answer is b).
However, in science, the facts are referred to as "theories" - even gravity which we all experience, is known as a "theory", so there are also good arguments for the option c).
However, as I said, in the common understanding of the word, these theories are facts - if we disprove them, we stop calling them theories, and they are only hypotheses.
The text defines Logos Speech as the choice we make to consider others' thoughts and feelings in our communication and general behavior
Communication (Latin: communicate, meaning “to share” or “to associate with”) is defined as “self and others, private and public, inner thoughts and this As the definition suggests, communication is difficult to define in a uniform way because in general terms communication refers to a very wide variety of actions involved in the dissemination of information. John Peters argues that the difficulty in defining communication is that it is both a universal phenomenon (because everyone communicates) and a specific field of organized academic research. It is argued that this is due to the fact that
Learn more about communication here
brainly.com/question/26152499
#SPJ4
