When independent kingdoms were formed, they all competed for the

1 answer:

7 0

Middle kingdoms of India (or Classical India) refers to the political entities in India from the 3rd century BCE to the 13th century CE. This period begins after the decline of the Maurya Empire, and the corresponding rise of the Satavahana dynasty, beginning with Simuka, from 230 BCE. The "Middle" period lasts for some 1500 years, and ends in the 13th century with the rise of the Delhi Sultanate and the end of the Later Cholas (Rajendra Chola III died in 1279 CE). The period is known as the classical period of India, during which India is estimated to have had the largest economy of the world controlling between one third and one fourth of the world's wealth.

You might be interested in

1) What top-secret documents, made public in 1971 newspapers, indicated that military officers and government officials were dec

bonufazy [111]

D. The "Pentagon Papers"

5 0

4 years ago

Briefly explain ONE major difference between Wood’s and Bailyn’s historical interpretations of why the American colonies rebelle

vesna_86 [32]

Answer:

The ONE major difference between Wood’s and Bailyn’s historical interpretations of why the American colonies rebelled against the British is:

According to Wood, the American colonies rebelled and revolted out of reasoned principle. They had the mindset that they were "born heirs of freedom" and that freedom is their everyday life. While, according to Bailyn, the colonies rebelled and revolted due to the rise of conspirators who stood against their freedom.

Explanation:

Wood's and Bailey's historical interpretations of why the American colonies rebelled against the British can be seen from the excerpt. It's evident that their interpretations differ.

Wood revealed that the Americans didn't rebel due to suffering but due to a "reasoned principle". Whereas, Bailey interpreted it to be that the conspirators against the liberty propelled the revolt.

5 0

4 years ago

How much knowledge was lost in the library of alexandria?

Liono4ka [1.6K]

A lot of knowledge was lost in the library of alexandria

8 0

3 years ago

Why might Hans Brosamer's woodcut (Source D) be an effective propaganda weapon against Martin Luther?

Stella [2.4K]

Answer:

It showed Martin Luther as an Antichrist with seven heads with different opinions.

Explanation:

Martin Luther's reformation was not welcome among the Catholic worshipers in Europe. By looking at the increasing people following Luther's religion, the Catholics started to spread propaganda against him. Woodcuts (engraved pamphlets) became a foremost way of declaring messages in the propaganda wars during the Protestant Reformation. Protestants and Catholics charged one another practices, doctrines, and leaders through prints.

Hans Brosamer's woodcut 'Caricature of Luther with Seven Heads', applied as a propaganda weapon for the Catholics against Martin Luther because it gave him a character of an Antichrist whose opinions would probably be as different as his seven heads.

6 0

3 years ago

Helppppppppppppppppp

stiks02 [169]

Answer: Every Bill … shall, before it become a law, be presented to the President of the United States …"

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago