Swift uses satire in the passage to criticize society he suggests. He makes the implication that the English don't care about the people from Ireland and would be okay with using kids from Ireland as food.
Who is Jonathan Swift?
Jonathan Swift, who was born in London on 30 November 1667 and died in Dublin on 19 October 1745, was a satirist, author, essayist, political pamphleteer (first for the Whigs, then for the Tories), poet, and Anglican cleric. He also served as dean of St. Patrick's Cathedral, earning him the moniker "Dean Swift."
A Tale of a Tub (1704), An Argument Against the Elimination of Christianity (1712), Gulliver's Travels (1726), and A Modest Proposal are among the works by Swift that are most renowned (1729). He is acknowledged as the English language's best prose humorist by the Encyclopedia Britannica, while his poetry is less widely known. Horatian and Juvenalian satire were two forms of humour he was a master at.
His satire has come to be known as "Swiftian" due to his deadpan, sardonic writing style, especially in A Modest Proposal.
To learn more about Jonathan Swift from the given link
brainly.com/question/9066127
#SPJ4
How does Swift use satire in this passage to criticize society he suggests?
The tone of this passage is melancholy. Thus option (B) is correct.
<h3>What is the theme of Rose for Emily?</h3>
Rose for Emily was written by William Faulkner whose central message that people should let go of the past and move on with the present in order to get ready for the future.
Emily was an example of someone who was always living in the past's shadow; she clung to it and was reluctant to change.
According to the passage, the died of the Emily is the tragic moment for everyone in the family as well as our the whole town. Thus melancholy is the best described tone in the passage. Therefore the correct option is (B).
Learn more about Rose for Emily here:
brainly.com/question/5335868
#SPJ1
Answer:
One of the valuable reasons why homework should be banned is the fact most teachers fail to explain everything needed to solve the task during the class. Parents cannot help with every task. Student's friends lack the experience to help, and they have work to do.
The most important reason homework for students should be banned is because it interferes with invaluable, quality family time. Many students do not have enough time to have a break let alone time to spend with their families. Family time is important because it allows families to embrace each other's company.
Sometimes because a teacher has not explained something new well in class, the homework task is impossible. So children end up paying with their free time for the failings of their teachers. They also suffer punishments if work is done badly or late.
As well as limiting kids' leisure time, studies have shown that homework can cause emotional and physical fatigue and fuel negative attitudes about learning. Of course, for every homework skeptic, there's a defender. In fact, too much homework can do more harm than good. Researchers have cited drawbacks, including boredom and burnout toward academic material, less time for family and extracurricular activities, lack of sleep and increased stress.
Explanation:
Hope this helped. :))
Answer:
The purpose of persuasion in writing is to convince, motivate, or move readers toward a certain point of view, or opinion. The act of trying to persuade automatically implies more than one opinion on the subject can be argued.
The idea of an argument often conjures up images of two people yelling and screaming in anger. In writing, however, an argument is very different. An argument is a reasoned opinion supported and explained by evidence. To argue in writing is to advance knowledge and ideas in a positive way. Written arguments often fail when they employ ranting rather than reasoning.
Most people have strong views on controversial topics (ones that inspire extreme points of view or opinions) and are often very willing to share those strong views. However, imagine you are having a discussion with someone who is only willing to share a particular point of view, ignoring yours, which may be in opposition. The ideas presented by that person would be very narrow, almost as if the person has tunnel vision and is merely expressing a personal opinion. If that person does provide you with facts, they may often be skewed or not from a credible source. After the discussion, there is only a slight chance you would be convinced of the other person’s point of view. You may have new ideas you had not considered before or a new perspective, but you would probably not be thoroughly convinced because that person has not made any attempt to present a well-rounded, fact-based point of view. This is why it is essential for you to not only provide your reader with strong, substantiated evidenced, but also to ensure you present an argument that looks at the topic from multiple angles.
Now, you may be asking yourself, “How can my argument be convincing if I present ideas contrary to my main point of view?” Well, while you need to concede there are other views different from your own, it is very important to show your reader you have thought about different angles and that the conclusions you have come to have been critically developed. This evidence of critical thinking will elevate your argument to a level so that your reader cannot really have any objections to. Also, when you look at the structures for persuasive writing, outlined in the next section, you will learn how you can rebut the possible objections you present, essentially smashing those contrary ideas and showing how your point of view is the convincing one.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
beacuse he wished he had never possessed the skill to allie them to fly which in a way means he is jealous.Due to which he says that.
(Completely my opinion)
