D. Obama became more popular later on in his presidency.
Answer:
The British troops were well-disciplined.
Explanation:
"At dawn, we saw the redcoats marching towards us. There were hundreds of them."
"We are just farmers and townsmen defending our freedoms, defending ourselves against this aggression."
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
No, the Crusades weren’t justifiable. The Arab/Muslim conquest of the region centuries earlier wasn’t justifiable either. There were no good guys or bad guys in that conflict. Both sides were wrong.
From the perspective of Jews and Samaritans, it was really just two colonial powers (Crusaders and Arabs) fighting over a land that never rightfully belonged to either of them in the first place.
Explanation:
What is important today is to understand that the unjustified reaction of the Christian community to actions in the Holy Land can be compared to the reaction of people in the Muslim world to Western dominance. So, instead of something like the Crusades was seen as an acceptance by many Muslims of terrorism. If the Christian Crusades were bad, so is the Muslim acceptance for decades of terrorism, particularly towards Israeli civilians.
This is a true sentence:
<span>"in
the nineteenth century, there was so little trade between asia and the
west that japanese art had no real influence on what artists in europe
were doing."</span>
This is what each place had:
Africa——-> enslaved people (slave trade)
The Carribean Islands——-> Sugar (they have lots of sugar cane in places like jamaica)
American colonies——> Indigo ( it’s a plant that has very pigmented color grew in the American south, used to dye clothes and stuff like that)
hope this helped! :)
