I’m sorry I don’t know the answer I’m just trying to get enough questions to pass my final
William Julius Wilson is known to be a popular man in history. William Julius Wilson believes the cause of the emergence of an urban underclass is economic and social structural deficits in society.
William Julius Wilson was known to be born December 20, 1935. He was a famous American sociologist. He stated the importance of neighborhood effects and also showed how small employment opportunities and weakened institutional resources influenced poverty within American inner-city neighborhoods.
The underclass is known to be a collection of identifying traits, such as high rate of joblessness, single parents births etc.
See full question below
William Julius Wilson believes the cause of the emergence of an urban underclass is
a. the "culture of poverty."
b. prejudice and racism.
c. economic and social structural deficits in society.
d. too much immigration from some areas.
Using the binomial distribution, it is found that there is a:
- 0.0036 = 0.36% probability that both are allergic to pollen.
- 0.1164 = 11.64% probability that at least one is allergic to pollen.
<h3>What is the binomial distribution formula?</h3>
The formula is:
The parameters are:
- x is the number of successes.
- n is the number of trials.
- p is the probability of a success on a single trial.
Researching the problem on the internet, it is found that:
- 6% of the population is allergic to pollen, hence p = 0.06.
- Two people are chosen at random, hence n = 2.
The probability that both are allergic is P(X = 2), hence:
P(X = 2) = 0.06^2 = 0.0036.
0.0036 = 0.36% probability that both are allergic to pollen.
The probability of at least one is:
P(X >= 1) = 1 - P(X = 0) = 1 - 0.94^2 = 1 - 0.8836 = 0.1164.
0.1164 = 11.64% probability that at least one is allergic to pollen.
More can be learned about the binomial distribution at brainly.com/question/24863377
Answer:
Lamarckism, a theory of evolution based on the principle that physical changes in organisms during their lifetime—such as greater development of an organ or a part through increased use—could be transmitted to their offspring.
MOST LIKELY: Talk to each member of the team to learn their perception of how things are going and what challenges are faced. Listen intently with a goal of finding out how they really feel, rather than managing or convincing them to think otherwise.
Ask questions that help you gauge their personal morale, such as “How well do you think we are recognizing your contributions?”, “How appreciated do you feel here at work”, or “How close is this job to your ideal work?” The goal is to find out each person’s individual level of morale, because everyone’s morale contributes to the group morale.
THis should give you some idea of what specific things you need to work on to improve the morale level of each individual.
LEAST LIKELY: Blame individuals or the team and implement punitive or restrictive measures to force improvement. This does not work.
Look for a scapegoat or some magic bullet “motivational” action to apply to all equally.
Motivating employees to work more effectively means doing the harder work of learning what motivates them and providing that within the framework of your organization over a long enough period of time to create lasting change.
