Nativism is essentially the belief that the people who were born in a country should be favored rather than immigrants. This idea flared up in some of the American people after World War I because of patriotism, isolationism, and also the Red Scare.
After World War I, many people became isolationists, even some people in Congress. This meant that they did not want to become involved with foreign nations because they feared joining another war. Isolationism, along with the newfound patriotism that Americans found after the war, caused many people to not want immigrants in the country and wanted themselves to be favored.
The Red Scare also contributed to the flare-up of nativism after World War I. The First Red Scare happened after the Bolshevik Revolution and was a time where many Americans feared communism would spread to the United States and around the world. Some people even believed there were spies in the government trying to spread communism. This caused a lot of people to not want immigrants to enter the country, as they believed they were communists.
<span>make vast amounts of wealth by limiting competition, cutting production costs, and controlling prices.</span>
Laissez-faire or free enterprise system is the principle wherein the government has little or minimal interference in the nation's economy.
This principle allowed more people to open, specialize, and industrialize their business efforts. This practice boosted the economy making more profit not only for the business people but for the nation as a whole.
It also benefited consumers because they were able to have more choices in terms of basic and luxury products.
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The significance of having three branches of government is tremendous and can't be overemphasized. Some of the significance includes:
1. It makes the government effective and efficient.
2. Having three branches of government protects the rights of the citizens
3. It prevents arbitrary use of power by the government
Are there advantages if the responsibility to govern is shouldered only by one branch?
No there are no advantages. If any branch of government turned has all the power of the executive, judiciary, and legislative there will eventually be an arbitrary use of power in the long run, and this will affect the citizens and that society at large. This has been proven in human history in the past in the case of the dictator and absolute monarchy.
There are no options given, but historically speaking it was the invention of "Cotton Gin".
A cotton gin was a revolutionary invention which enabled people to
easily separate cotton fibers and seeds; previously it used to take a large
time sorting it manually. The inventor behind this was <span>Eli Whitney. The processing was made easy but
still slaves were needed to grow cotton.</span>