The difference between a hypothesis and theory is that the hypothesis is based on observations, but doesn't have a solid proof, while the theory is based on solid proof.
So in order for the scientist to make his hypothesis into theory about the connection of all the Earth's oceans, will need to provide a proof. This proof can be obtained by a sea traveling that will be well documented, and during the travel the scientist to manage to sail through all of the Earth's oceans without having any physical obstacle between any of them.
A possible cause was a meteorite hit the earth. it caused many organisms to become extinct because it blocked out the Sun so plants couldn't grow and herbivores couldn't eat the plants and carnivores couldn't eat herbivores.
Answer: B
a city's poorest and most disadvantaged citizens
Explanation:
this is the answer on the edges of the nuity
A convergent-plate boundary to the west of North America caused oceanic crust to be subducted, causing collisions with microcontinents and the partial melting of oceanic crust to create the Sierran volcanic arc.
<h3>Give an explanation of the plate tectonic conditions that led to the formation of the Sevier thrust belt and the Sierran arc. During the Laramide orogeny, what happened?</h3>
A convergent-plate boundary to the west of North America caused oceanic crust to be subducted, which led to collisions with microcontinents and the partial melting of oceanic crust that produced the Sierran volcanic arc. Compression was responsible for the arc's folds and thrust faults. As opposed to earlier orogenies that just established the more superficial faults of the fold-thrust belts behind the arc, faulting associated with the Laramide orogeny was responsible for the creation of the Rocky Mountains. The Sevier-style orogeny may have changed as a result of the subducting slab's shallowing dip.
Learn more about convergent-plate boundary: brainly.com/question/23845744
#SPJ4
