1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SSSSS [86.1K]
2 years ago
13

Which diagram accurately matches the civilization to its accomplishments on the indian subcontinent​

History
1 answer:
Diano4ka-milaya [45]2 years ago
5 0

The Mughal empire is the empire that spread Islam in the Indian subcontinent.

<h3>What empire was the Mughal empire?</h3>

This empire was an early Islamic empire that existed in the Indian subcontinent.

The ruler of this empire was the son of Akbar in the Southern part of Asia. He ruled from 1605 and 1627.

Read more on  the Mughal empire here: brainly.com/question/1594484

You might be interested in
How long was slavery legal in the united states?
siniylev [52]

Answer: Slavery was legal in most societies at some time in the past but is now outlawed in all recognized countries. The last country to officially abolish slavery was Mauritania in 1981. Nevertheless, there are an estimated 40.3 million people worldwide subject to some form of modern slavery.

Although even now people are still being enslaved without permission.

Hope this helps love.. (:

8 0
3 years ago
What were the four main points of the Monroe doctrine
Natasha2012 [34]
<span> (1) the United States would not interfere in the internal affairs of or the wars between European powers; (2) the United States recognized and would not interfere with existing colonies and dependencies in the Western Hemisphere; (3) the Western Hemisphere was closed to future colonization; and (4) any attempt by a European power to oppress or control any nation in the Western Hemisphere would be viewed as a hostile act against the United States.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
How did Charlemagne demonstrate his Christian faith
Akimi4 [234]
He whent around and told everyone about god and helpt them through tuff times

7 0
3 years ago
Understanding the Case
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.

-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

8 0
3 years ago
How did the British hope to limit American settlement in the northwest territory
pshichka [43]
by providing arms and ammunition to Native Americans.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • After World War II, which countries were the two great superpowers of the world?
    10·1 answer
  • What did Nixon believe would be the consequences of immediate U.S. withdrawal from Vietnam? What specific events did Nixon cite
    10·2 answers
  • Who was not part of the Big Three?
    9·1 answer
  • What were the 3 Acts the made up the "Intolerable Acts"?
    7·1 answer
  • What was false about Classical Greek religion
    5·1 answer
  • How is the path God is calling you along different and better than the culture's way of doing things?
    11·1 answer
  • A type of government that stresses nationalism &amp; places the interests of the state (country) above those of individuals. Pow
    10·1 answer
  • What did Rutherford B Hayes have to agree to do as President in the
    7·1 answer
  • Which did the emancipation proclamation not do?
    6·1 answer
  • How does the view of the map show the effects of trench warfare during World War I
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!