As a deputy postmaster, he became interested in the North Altlantic Ocean circulation patterns. While in England, Franklin heard a question about why it took mail longer to reach than RI. He then asked his cousin who told him that merchant ships routinely avouded a strong eastbound mid-ocean current while the mail packets captain sailed dead into it, fighting an adverse current.
A . is my thinking and answer
Answer:
<h3>The Imperial order for a Kamikaze attack against Bunker Hill was his fate.</h3>
Explanation:
Japan used kamikaze as a war tactic against the US by crashing into aircraft carriers. Young men were forcefully drafted to 'tokkotai', a s uicide corps, as a service to the country. These young men were often used as s uicide bombers and had to accept their fate.
Many Kamikaze survivors recount this event as very disturbing and unsettling as they had to forcefully lay down their lives by crashing into US aircraft carriers. Likewise, Kiyoshi Ogawa was one among the many kamikaze pilots who had to accept that s uicide was his fate.
It depends on what penalties, and the severity of the student cheating.
So, the student is cheating on something minor, something unimportant, then I don't think they need to be kicked out of class just for that, but maybe get a 0 on that whole thing and that will teach them a lesson.
If the student is cheating on something important (excluding big tests), then the school should probably: A, give them a 0 on it or B, move them down to a lower level so the student feels like they don't have to cheat.
The worst thing they could do is cheat on a really big test like an exam, then they will probably end up with a big fat 0 on it all and flunk that class, or get kicked out of class.
Lots of people (adults and kids) think that penalties should be easier on the kids, but I don't agree with that. If the kid has done something wrong, then the kid needs to pay for their actions and deal with the consequences.