The correct answer is B) the U.S. bombing of North Vietnam had been ineffective.
<em>Robert McNamara´s change in policy regarding the war was influenced by a defense study that found that the U.S. bombing of North Vietnam had been ineffective.
</em>
Robert S. McNamara (1916-2009) was the Secretary of Defense during the U.S.-Vietnam War. During his tenure, McNamara thought that the U.S. Army had to be prepared to fight the war in any conditions, so he reorganized the United States defense program.
In 1967 he ordered a study of the role of the U.S. in Vietnam. The document was known as “The Pentagon Papers.” Disillutioned by the war results, he resigned in 1968.
The bricks created a more reliable source. Stone would have crumbled away fast do to weathering and it was very expensive back in the time it was built to buy or make stone. Bricks was an easy fix that could build fast and not be as costly
Different tools for different jobs used differently by different people.
Remember, from a population base of about the same size (two million) the Mongols deployed far more archers much farther from home. There were twice as many Mongol archers (30,000) at Mohi alone (thousands of miles from home) than there were English archers at Crecy, Poitiers, and Agincourt (right next door) combined (15,000).
The English would not have done any better, nor worse, with the Mongol recurve bow. The Mongols would have done worse with the longbow. That’s due to how they fought with them, not how good or bad the bows were.
Draw weights were comparable. English longbows ranged from 80–120lbs at the beginning of the Hundred Years War (which the English lost BTW) to 100–140lbs by the end. By the 16th century most of the bows found on the the ship Mary Rose were in the 140–160lbs range, with the heaviest at about 185lbs.
Answer:
no
Explanation:
I said no because Alexander Hamilton and the United States of America where already friends with Grate Britian but they wanted to pressure Britain becuase the united states thiught that britain was weak and other things to.
Answer: A secondary source is made later by someone who did not experience first hand or participate in the events or conditions you're looking at.
Explanation:
