The correct answer is D) nothing specific
At that time, the US focused on other things such as repairing Europe and ensuring that it's economy was the strongest in the world. It was not so important for the US that Mao Zedong took over China.
The treaty of Versailles was an unfair one. The "war guilt" clause forced Germany and her allies to take all the blame for the world war. Moreover, Germany lost it's land, overseas colonies, population, and coal and iron industry. Germany was also made to pay reparations and limit their armed forces.
The treaty of Versailles was an invitation to deadlier wars in the future. In fact, it can be concluded that the treaty was a controversy in itself. Because Germany was subjected to ill treatment and was made to pay reparations beyond the country's capacity post war, it became the mojor cause for the WW II.
Yes, as this would ensure more equal representation for the US's states and all territories which is occupied without much care. These territories would be able to become involved, allowing the people more freedom and more power, creating a better living situation for themselves and therefore bettering the US as a whole by creating a new area of opportunity.
<span>C. Northern Mexico.....I believe that's the answer. I could be wrong but I'm positive that's the correct answer.</span>
For an elected official to serve as a "delegate" means that the voters of that state or district want the person they elect to represent their interests. They're not saying, "We voted for you because we trust you to do what's best for us." They're saying, "We've indicated to you what we want and need for this state or district, so we want you to go to Congress and work for those things on our behalf."
When voters feel this way, elected officials will feel they must carry out the will of the voters in their state or district or risk being removed from office when the next election occurs. Since representatives to the House serve only two year terms, while members of the Senate serve six year terms, you can expect the delegate theory will affect the US House representatives more immediately and prominently. Their actions in office will still be fresh in memory when the next election cycle occurs. Senators have a longer time to establish a track record that will earn the trust of their constituents.
