Answer:
Need for a quiet area from religious persecution
Explanation:
The European landscape was changing dramatically. One of the changes took place in the form of religious drift. As the monarchies were becoming obsolete, there was still, restricted freedom for worship. People were required to pay homage to the systems established by the Catholic system. In addition, there was the issues of the high tax on the land. Thus, some people embarked on a journey on sea on the ship called the Mayflower. America, upon their arrival, was a land that represented freedom.
Answer:
I would believe gym membership
Explanation:
Everything else would make sense for a career choice wants except for a gym membership. It isn't as valuable as all the other benefits
Answer:
Generally cities cause people to become more liberal, have a social hierarchy, and promote the general abundance of transportation.
Explanation:
Socially, you can have tenements form, races can self and forcefully segregate, and people tend to become more liberal with exposure to other races.
Cultural is kind of related. People tend to clump into ideological groups (if you can give me the context of the question I can better answer).
Political life, like I said they tend to become more liberal. If your question is centered around the 1920's you could discuss child labor laws.
Answer:
It’s common to describe ruthless or devious politicians as “Machiavellian.” But rarely in the United States have we seen an embodiment of the traits Machiavelli admired quite like Donald Trump, the president-elect.
Go down the list of Trump’s controversial characteristics and you will find many of the qualities the cynical Machiavelli thought were essential for a tough leader. Trump can be a liar, which the Florentine philosopher believed was sometimes a necessary part of leadership. He can be a bully, like some of the Italian potentates Machiavelli lauded. He has boasted of a voracious sexual appetite, like Machiavelli himself.
To say that Trump displays attributes that Machiavelli deemed necessary in the fractious, perpetually warring states of the 16th century is not to recommend him as a modern leader. Nobody would want a neo-feudal dictator to lead a 21st-century democracy, you might think. But the American public voted Tuesday for Trump, perhaps in part because it shares Machiavelli’s concept of strength, or as he liked to call it, “virtue
Explanation:
hey here is your answer
