The influence of the founder in population genetics is the loss of genetic advantages that occur when a new generation of the population arises from a very small number of individuals who were previously part of a larger group (for example, a small group of animals survived a mass extinction event). Ernest Meyer was the first to develop the full concept of the term in 1952, and was able to do so using other theoretical work by scientists such as Sioual Wright. As a result of the loss of genetic differentiation, the new generation may be very different from their grandparents both genetically and morphologically. The influence of the founder is believed to lead in some exceptional cases to evolutionary diversity and to the emergence of new types of more sophisticated creatures.
In the picture to the left, indigenous people have almost equal numbers of red and blue individuals, while the three smaller founding groups show that one color can become predominant or fixed (the influence of the founder) as a result of random selection from the indigenous population. A bottleneck may also cause a founding effect even if it does not represent a completely new population.
The influence of the founder is a special case of genetic drift as well as the exposure of the new population to the influence of the founder. They are also often very small populations, and because of this, they appear to be increasingly sensitive to genetic drift, increase in internal reproduction and relatively low genetic differentiation. This can be seen in the limited gene ponds of Iceland, the Isle of the Resurrection and the Pitcairn Islands. Another example of this phenomenon is the enormous proportion of the Deaf population in Martha Vineyard, which led to the development of Marathas Vineyard's sign language.
Overseas markets expanded as the colonists increased their production levels and supplies. Their imports also grew throughout the 18th century, as increasingly prosperous,and numerous,colonists expanded their demand for food and manufactured goods.
They also wanted to resist to Parlimentary taxation,the colonists sought to control their economic clout as one unified body. Boycotting was one of the first and one of the most important methods they employed,starting with all the merchants who pledged to refuse all of Britain’s goods in 1765 until the Stamp Act was repealed
Afterwards:The war had disrupted much of the American economy. On the Oceans the British navy had great superiority and destroyed most American ships, crippling the flow of trade.On the land, where both armies regularly stole from local farms in order to find food, farmers also suffered tremendously.When the fighting came to an end in 1781, the economy was in a shambles. Exports to Britain were restricted. Further, British law prohibited trade with Britain's remaining sugar colonies in the Caribbean therefore two major sources of colonial-era commerce were eliminated. Then a flood of cheap British manufactured imports that sold cheaper than comparable American-made goods made the post-war economic slump even worse than it was. finally, the high level of debt taken on by the states to fund the war effort added to the economic crisis by helping to fuel rapid inflation.
Answer:
I wouldn't trust this website! I can see why it would be questionable.
Explanation:
If the website lists more advertisements than the information, itself, It's more than likely not a credible source. In order to find a credible website, you must
-check to see when the article was written. If its older than five years old, the information would be labeled as "out-of-date". You want something that is updated.
-See if the authors name is listed. How about if the article lists about the author. This way you would know if the author specializes in a certain subject, much like the one their article is written about. Research the author and see if they have any other articles they've written about.
-If the advertisement takes up a majority of the page (just like pop-ups/videos that play automatically), their goal is to distract the reader from doing their thing on the website. The goal of the advertisement is to persuade and inform the reader of minimal information as possible.
Hence, I wouldn't think this website is as credible as it seems. Keep in mind to check these tings when doing research. Stay safe out there.
I truly hope this helps. If not, oh well.
UwU
