Interpretive claims is not necessary in a historical essay.
<u>Answer:</u> Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
A historical essay is defined as an essay illustrating assertions about historic events that are substantiated by adequate evidence to give the viewers a greater clarity and knowledge of that specific event.
Interpretive claims are points of view which are explored and evaluated in an essay. Although interpretive claims could be well-versed and advocated by historical record, it is regarded subjective since the writer uses it to voice their opinion. They are not essential for a historical essay because those claims represent the writer's opinion or perception of an event or topic that is not far mandated in a historical essay.
Hey there,
<span>Establishing their supremacy over most of Eurasia, Mongols were highly mobile on horseback and extremely intimidating. Mongols were also known as a war machine.
Hope this helps :))
</span>~Top
Could you give me the choices
Answer:
- Agustín de Iturbide
- Vicente Guerrero
- Iturbide
- Tejanos
- Erasmo Seguín
- La Bahía
- The Rio Grande?
- Jacales
I do hope all these are right, as I know nothing about this subject...
Hope this helped you!