Answer:
d. interpersonal function of emotions
Explanation:
Our emotions have different functions. One of them is the interpersonal function.
The interpersonal function of emotions refers to the fact that we are constantly expressing emotions when interacting with others, and others can judge those emotional expressions. Therefore, emotions influence others and our social interactions.
Our emotions communicate information about our feelings and intentions and they provoke responses from others (who response to our emotions and to what we try to communicate to them)
In this example, when Marlon gets sad, his girlfriend becomes nurturing and tries to take care of him. These responses by his girlfriend show that <u>she is responding to the emotions shown by Marlon and that this emotions provoke a response in her. </u>Therefore, this demonstrate the interpersonal function of emotions.
The public approved of Martin Van Buren because he was sticking policies similar to Andrew Jackson, the previous president. Jackson also helped campaign Buren. Buren supported lower tariffs while his opponent, the Whig Party, did not. He also advocated free trade and set up system of bonds for the national debt.
Answer:
The sense of smell is excluded as a function of the thalamus.
Explanation:
Thalamus is a large mass of gray matter in the diencephalon of the brain with several functions such as regulating the body's voluntary motor control, consciousness and sleep and wake cycle. The thalamus decides which signals from the ears, eyes, mouth and skin to relay to its area in the cerebral cortex.
Answer: realities of economic disparity became more apparent
Explanation:
When it became more glaringly obvious to people that the economic disparity between the blacks and the whites was quite much because the system was built on the foundation of oppressing some groups and keeping them poor and disenfranchised, more people in the civil rights movement became radicalized.
Up till then, they had believed that civil rights could be won legally and nonviolently became the system could be changed but after the disparity was noticed, a lot of people began calling for the system to be revamped entirely.
Answer: Negatively
Explanation:
Enlightenment ideas were not completely against monarchs but did have problems with the absolute nature of the rule of said monarchs.
Before Enlightenment, monarchs generally ruled as they pleased with the logic being that they had the right to rule from God and so had the right to control the nation as their personal property.
Enlightenment was against this and instead espoused the logic that a monarch was only able to rule due to a social contract signed between them and the people whereby they would be allowed to rule provided they took care of their subjects.
Monarchs reacted to this with negativity because it meant that they had to stop being so selfish with resources and had to share power with the people. As time went on however, and with constant pressure on them, they had to relent and it led to the dissolution of several monarchies in Europe and the transition of others to Constitutional Monarchies.
