The correct answer is C) bicameralism.
A country is federal if it satisfies all of the following criteria EXCEPT bicameralism.
We can consider a government "federal" if satisfies the following characteristics: a geopolitical division, independence, and a direct government.
What results from the federal system of government in the United States is that State governments have some powers that the federal government does not have.
The United States government is a federal government with three branches under the system of checks and balances. The executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch. Under this system, none of the three branches has more power than the other.
Answer:
Slow in terms of progress
Explanation:
Hi! The answer to your question would be slow in terms of progress. This means that, according to the punctuated-equilibrium model, Brent would a little behind.
According to terror management theory, to mute the defensive and anxious response that most people have when confronted with the thought of their own death, they should experience some form of: positive feedback that boosts self-esteem.
<h3>What is the terror management theory?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the model that people developed that has to do with the way that people would have to offer protection to themselves against all of the concerns that has to do with death. Based on the theory, the way that people respond to the issues of death may be conscious and it could also be unconscious.
Hence we can say that to mute the defensive and anxious response that most people have when confronted with the thought of their own death, they should experience some form of: positive feedback that boosts self-esteem.
Read more on terror management theory here: brainly.com/question/28336374
#SPJ1
Answer:The Statute is an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause.
Explanation:The Statute is an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause. Regulation of foreign commerce is exclusively a federal power because of the need for the federal government to speak with one voice when regulating commercial relations with foreign governments. The existence of legitimate state interests underlying state legislation will not justify state regulation of foreign commerce. The state statute, in imposing requirements for a license costing $50 and for a clear marking of goods as being from a foreign country, clearly is an attempt by the state to restrict or even eliminate the flow of such goods in foreign commerce. Thus, the statute is unconstitutional.
