1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Natalija [7]
2 years ago
8

Which two statements explain some Americans' objections to the results of the 2000 presidential election?

History
1 answer:
LenKa [72]2 years ago
4 0

Two statements which show some American objection to the 2000 Presidential election were:

  • 1. The Supreme Court's ruling on the Florida recount appeared partisan to many observers.
  • 5. George W. Bush was elected in spite of losing the popular vote.

<h3>What happened in the 2000 Presidential election?</h3>

George Bush was able to beat Al Gore even though he lost the popular vote because he won at the Electoral College.

This caused consternation amongst Americans as well as the ruling by the Supreme Court on the Florida recount appearing to be partisan - in favor of a party.

Find out more on the 2000 Presidential election at brainly.com/question/556024.

You might be interested in
What did the Virginia Plan propose? Text to speech A:A. Two houses of Congress with representation based on state population B:B
Lapatulllka [165]

Answer:

The right option is:

A. Two houses of Congress with representation based on state population .

Explanation:

The plan was written by James Madison at the Constitutional Convention of 1787. The plan reflected the interests of Virginia, which was the most populated state. It wanted representation in the federal legislature based on population and wealth. During the debates, New Jersey proposed an alternative plan. The Virginia Plan is historical because it was the first document that gave suggestions for a separation of powers among the branches of the US government.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1 plus 1 is 2 very easy
Bumek [7]

Answer:

indeed it is

Explanation:

Whitehead and Russell's Principia Mathematica is famous for taking a thousand pages to prove that 1+1=2. Of course, it proves a lot of other stuff, too. If they had wanted to prove only that 1+1=2, it would probably have taken only half as much space.

Principia Mathematica is an odd book, worth looking into from a historical point of view as well as a mathematical one. It was written around 1910, and mathematical logic was still then in its infancy, fresh from the transformation worked on it by Peano and Frege. The notation is somewhat obscure, because mathematical notation has evolved substantially since then. And many of the simple techniques that we now take for granted are absent. Like a poorly-written computer program, a lot of Principia Mathematica's bulk is repeated code, separate sections that say essentially the same things, because the authors haven't yet learned the techniques that would allow the sections to be combined into one.

For example, section ∗22, "Calculus of Classes", begins by defining the subset relation (∗22.01), and the operations of set union and set intersection (∗22.02 and .03), the complement of a set (∗22.04), and the difference of two sets (∗22.05). It then proves the commutativity and associativity of set union and set intersection (∗22.51, .52, .57, and .7), various properties like &#x03B1;&#x2229;&#x03B1;=&#x03B1;" role="presentation" style="display: inline; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; font-size: 16px; text-indent: 0px; text-align: left; text-transform: none; letter-spacing: normal; word-spacing: normal; overflow-wrap: normal; white-space: nowrap; float: none; direction: ltr; max-width: none; max-height: none; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; border: 0px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; position: relative;">α∩α=αα∩α=α (∗22.5) and the like, working up to theorems like ∗22.92: &#x03B1;&#x2282;&#x03B2;&#x2192;&#x03B1;&#x222A;(&#x03B2;&#x2212;&#x03B1;)" role="presentation" style="display: inline; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; font-size: 16px; text-indent: 0px; text-align: left; text-transform: none; letter-spacing: normal; word-spacing: normal; overflow-wrap: normal; white-space: nowrap; float: none; direction: ltr; max-width: none; max-height: none; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; border: 0px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; position: relative;">α⊂β→α∪(β−α)α⊂β→α∪(β−α).

Section ∗23 is "Calculus of Relations" and begins in almost exactly the same way, defining the subrelation relation (∗23.01), and the operations of relational union and intersection (∗23.02 and .03), the complement of a relation (∗23.04), and the difference of two relations (∗23.05). It later proves the commutativity and associativity of relational union and intersection (∗23.51, .52, .57, and .7), various properties like &#x03B1;&#x2229;&#x02D9;&#x03B1;=&#x03B1;" role="presentation" style="display: inline; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; font-size: 16px; text-indent: 0px; text-align: left; text-transform: none; letter-spacing: normal; word-spacing: normal; overflow-wrap: normal; white-space: nowrap; float: none; direction: ltr; max-width: none; max-height: none; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; border: 0px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; position: relative;">α∩˙α=αα∩˙α=α (∗22.5) and the like, working up to theorems like ∗23.92: &#x03B1;&#x2282;&#x02D9;&#x03B2;&#x2192;&#x03B1;&#x222A;&#x02D9;(&#x03B2;&#x2212;&#x02D9;&#x03B1;)" role="presentation" style="display: inline; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; font-size: 16px; text-indent: 0px; text-align: left; text-transform: none; letter-spacing: normal; word-spacing: normal; overflow-wrap: normal; white-space: nowrap; float: none; direction: ltr; max-width: none; max-height: none; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; border: 0px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; position: relative;">α⊂˙β→α∪˙(β−˙α)α⊂˙β→α∪˙(β−˙α.

4 0
3 years ago
Why did president Roosevelt demand broad executive powers for presidency?
ivolga24 [154]
So he can bring the country out of depression.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
what is the most important reason for the end of the (western) roman empire? and what is the least important reason for the end
dsp73
The most important reason for the collapse of Rome was the failure to actually integrate what they conquered. When Roman soldiers conquered new lands, it was rare that they ever attempted to force their culture, ideals, or laws upon the natives and barbarians. Thus, when the Empire began suffering internal struggles, the natives they had conquered decided to take action, which lead to the swift collapse by barbarian invasion from all sides. It's hard to pick a LEAST important reason, seeing that there were many of them, but I suppose a contender would most likely be the common refusal of the Empire to even acknowledge that barbarians were rising. On the outer edges of their territory, in places like Gaul and Morocco, the Roman government was reluctant to even recognize the threat of the barbarians, thinking that even accepting that these barbarians were causing trouble would weaken their prestige in the public eye.
4 0
3 years ago
How do the views of Evans and Hughes about being American differ? Explain your answer and support it with evidence from the text
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:

"The boy in the striped pajamas" is a boy of the war time in Germany who only knows how to love and care for his friend. He is not bothered about the wire and the boundaries that separate him from his friend.

Explanation:

I hope this helped!

Have a wonderful day! :)

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which number on the map shows Cuba? 1 2 3 4
    10·2 answers
  • Do you believe Maria Reynolds should be the one to blame on the affair or should Alexander Hamilton be the one to blame?
    12·2 answers
  • According to the president’s speech, what were some effects of the financial crisis?
    14·1 answer
  • What event spurred passage of the civil service reform act of 1883
    12·1 answer
  • According to winston churchill, what was the iron curtain ?
    10·1 answer
  • Why does Winthrop consider “natural” liberty dangerous?
    12·1 answer
  • Imaging that you were alive during the time period of the Scientific Revolution. Based on your understanding of this time period
    12·1 answer
  • Why was Tom Hanks not recognized as an official US representative in movie bridge of spies?
    8·1 answer
  • (HELLUVA BOSS) Where is my Blitzy?
    8·2 answers
  • Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs match the terms with their meanings 1. dharma 2. ahimsa 3. karma
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!