If I spent the night alone in my favorite store I will get something to sleep on so I can get ready for that night.Then i collapse to the floor because I got hungry . After I got up and collect food
The similarity between the attitude of A.A. Milne and Emily Dickinson is <em>D) They both have a </em><em>reverence</em><em> toward </em><em>books</em><em>.</em>
Alan Alexander Milne wrote many books for children and poems to demonstrate his reverence for books. He loved books, which took him to study classics.
For Emily Dickinson, she was a bookworm from childhood. She displayed a deep understanding of the formal poetic structure, defying some restrictions, to show that she had become a <em>master</em><em> of </em><em>books</em>, especially poetry. Above, she penned a title,<em> “There Is No Frigate Like a Book,” </em>to display her deep reverence toward books.
Based on this similarity, both A.A. Milne and Emily Dickinson did not display:
- <em>An </em><em>objective attitude</em><em> toward </em><em>books</em>
- <em>A </em><em>distrustful attitude</em><em> toward </em><em>books</em>
- <em>An </em><em>indifference</em><em> toward </em><em>books</em><em>.</em>
Thus, A.A. Milne and Emily Dickinson both have a reverence for books.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/9647906
Answer:
Each object in the phrase must be placed in a queue.
Explanation:
In order for an application to make efficient translations in real time, it is important for the user to put the words of the sentence they want to translate in the correct order in which they appear in that sentence. This will allow the application's interface to understand the phrase and be able to translate it as accurately as possible. In this case, we can consider that each object forming the sentence must be placed in a queue so that it is possible to translate that sentence.
Answer:
1. dance 1. present
2. danced 2. past
3. will dance 3. future
4. have danced 4. present perfect
5. had danced 5. past perfect
6. will have danced 6. future perfect
Explanation:
A verb in the present maintains the infinitive form but without "to". For example: to walk --> walk
In the past, if the verb is regular, it gains -d, -ed, or -ied: walk --> walked
In the future, we use the auxiliary "will." Example: to walk --> will walk
The present perfect uses the auxiliary "have" and the main verb in the past participle: have walked
The past perfect uses the auxiliary "had" and the main verb in the past participle as well: had walked.
Finally, the future perfect uses both auxiliaries "will" and "have" plus the main verb in the past participle: will have walked.