Answer: The comparison of Nicholas II and Vladimir Lenin
Explanation Both the leaders were hungry for power and came onto to become leaders by promising good for the people but the similarity didn't catch one's eye but how different to each historical figure was has been highlighted many a time.
- Nicholas II was czar and hence being born into a royal family made him an obvious leader whereas Lenin gained prominence in the party and came into power thus.
- Lenin had the willingness to lead Russia used the Bolshevik party to do so, however the Tsar was happy to be with his family and pets and not a bit interested in leadership.
- Nicholas II and his entire family were assassinated whereas Lenin died of natural causes way later.
- Lenin was the more brutal of the two and used his power to get what he wanted even if it meant torturing or murdering. here Nicholas made some concessions.
- The military responsibility was on Nicholas II during his regime but when Lenin took over he would delegate it.
Finally, none of them actually cared for the poor, the oppressed were further in distress when these two came to power.
<u>Answer:</u>
The name 'Pilgrims' as applied to Plymouth Separatists, was quoted by historians from William Bradford.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Though the name 'pilgrims' appeared in the recitation of Chandler Robbins for the first time in 1793, it was first used by historian William Bradford in a document drafted by him.
It was after William Bradford that many historians started to Plymouth Separatists by the name 'Pilgrims'. It was only by 1820, that the name 'Pilgrims' became common and the Plymouth Separatists started being called by that name all over.
The best answer in regards to the specific question appears to be A: Many small towns boomed as people came to drill wells.
This geographic polarization makes the population politically speaking to be very divided because these points of geographical difference are very significant for determining political polarization.
Classical Political Geography has as its precursor the German geographer Friedrich Ratzel, who laid the scientific and systematizing bases for this science with the publication, in 1897, of the work Political Geography. For Ratzel, the strength of the State was closely linked to space - in its shape, extent, relief, climate and availability of natural resources -, to its position - social relations established between the State and its circulating environment at the national and international level - and, finally, to the sense (or spirit) of the people, which represented the strength of that determined people in relation to another. These ideas, understood in a simplistic and distorted way, would be known as "geographic determinism". (Geographical determinism, however, occurs when natural elements are given the sole role in defining the constitutive aspects of societies.)
Answer:
President Harry Truman
Explanation:
President Harry Truman, who insisted on free elections for Eastern European countries
