Answer:
a. cosθ = ¹/₂[e^jθ + e^(-jθ)] b. sinθ = ¹/₂[e^jθ - e^(-jθ)]
Step-by-step explanation:
a.We know that
e^jθ = cosθ + jsinθ and
e^(-jθ) = cosθ - jsinθ
Adding both equations, we have
e^jθ = cosθ + jsinθ
+
e^(-jθ) = cosθ - jsinθ
e^jθ + e^(-jθ) = cosθ + cosθ + jsinθ - jsinθ
Simplifying, we have
e^jθ + e^(-jθ) = 2cosθ
dividing through by 2 we have
cosθ = ¹/₂[e^jθ + e^(-jθ)]
b. We know that
e^jθ = cosθ + jsinθ and
e^(-jθ) = cosθ - jsinθ
Subtracting both equations, we have
e^jθ = cosθ + jsinθ
-
e^(-jθ) = cosθ - jsinθ
e^jθ + e^(-jθ) = cosθ - cosθ + jsinθ - (-jsinθ)
Simplifying, we have
e^jθ - e^(-jθ) = 2jsinθ
dividing through by 2 we have
sinθ = ¹/₂[e^jθ - e^(-jθ)]
If it was line symmetry it would need to repeat the same shape twice, which the first follows but the second doesn’t.
if it was rotational, you would need to be able to take the shape in the top right and rotate it counterclockwise or clockwise to get the shape that locks in place. that doesn’t follow that.
both line and rotational symmetry is incorrect because the first example would need to lock up inside the right side of that example.
the answer is C
Answer:
a
Step-by-step explanation:
as x goes up by 1 y goes up by 4
Answer:
undefined
Step-by-step explanation:
f(x) does not handle the 0 case because 0 is less than 1 and greater than -4