The choice is D
Stalin was a Russian leader<span />
Individual rights may obstruct justice in some ways by permitting a person to bargain for a crime committed. This may not be good for the common good.
----------------
I hope this answer has helped you, and my apologies if this answer has strayed from the right answer.
Answer:
Explanation:
I don't think it's possible to make a bad speech about 9/11. I married an American who was at home getting ready to go to work when it happened. We don't watch television. We're both too busy. But we have one. I phoned home at somewhere around 8:00 or 9:00 and told her she could be a little late, but she had to turn on the TV. She didn't want to do but I insisted. So she did it. I saw her an hour later. There were streak marks coming away from her eyes.
She didn't say much. She just said "Who would want to do that? Why did they do it?"
That's basically all she had to say.
President Bush was saying much the same thing. In general that's the way most people responded. There was shock and there were tears. The indignation and anger came later. But for a bit, everybody was a New Yorker trying to make out what happened. Trying to sympathize.
Just trying to feel the horror that befell them.
I think every answer that was provided under “Group of answer choices” would be appropriate and the reasoning why would be because the legislative branch has the power to change laws, the legislative branch can limit powers of the other branches. The legislative branch can also appoint representatives. The legislative branch can appoint Supreme Court Justices.
Answer: While it was true that the cotton gin reduced the labor of removing seeds, it did not reduce the need for slaves to grow and pick the cotton. In fact, the opposite occurred. Cotton growing became so profitable for the planters that it greatly increased their demand for both land and slave labor. hope this helps pls pls give me brainliest
Explanation:
