I think it's number A because it is too kind of a funny
Answer:
Such results only tell us how well one is programmed to regurgitate mostly useless information, mostly in regards to one of 7 kinds of intelligence.
This can be a good indicator on whether or not a person will be able to handle even higher amounts of regurgitation of information at the university level. The hope is that students will major in a study that will at least expose them to the tools of critical thinking, which is mostly limited to the hard sciences.
“Learners” who score high can will feel overblown grandiose feelings, and see themselves as superior to those with lower scores, regardless of their future accomplishments (or lack of them). “Learners” who score low will tend to feel humbled and maybe depressed, in that they are typecast as being somehow unable to be much of a future contributor to society.
Fortunately, a significant number of people at ANY point of the spectrum of such scoring to see how well trained a monkey they are, realize the absurdity of such scoring, and go on to find out where they DO excel in one of the other 7 kinds of intelligence. They often end up contributing MORE to society, once they find there “gift” where they “score” much higher
Explanation:
The Dog ran from the tree to the swing set is the answer. because it moves across the same plane and doesn't turn or reflect across any axis' and it doesn't shrink or grow. Hope it helped!
Answer:
no. 3 is correct answer of your question ^_^
<em>We</em><em> </em><em>didn't </em><em>have</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>visit</em><em> </em><em>Lumbini </em><em>.</em>
The correct answer is "select the best solution". After evaluating possible solutions, that is considering the advantages and degree of effectiveness of each solution, the following step is to choose the most suitable solution. The other option refers to previous steps in the creative problem solving process
