Answer:
Your answer would be phrase.
Explanation:
The OxFord definition of phrase is - "a small group of words standing together as a conceptual unit..."
Answer:
Personification.
Explanation:
Personification is defined as <em>attributing human characteristics to nonhuman</em>, or in this case, attributing the characteristics of "<em>stooping</em>" and "<em>leans down</em>" to the sky. The sky does not technically stoop or lean down, but is described as such.
Learn more about personification, here:
brainly.com/question/21297567
Answer:
Electricity, car runs on gas, coffee maker runs on electricity
The answer to the given question above would be the first option. Based on the article "Introduction to Modern Drama Study," the common issue that is addressed in feminist dramas is the <span>effect a husband could have on his wife. Hope this answers your question.</span>
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
I have trouble believing Mr. Sawicki's characterization of Steve, because he knows Steve only in school. Since Mr. Sawicki does not know Steve outside of school, he cannot make a judgment about what Steve has been doing in his neighborhood or who his friends are. Sawicki says Steve is honest, but even if Steve is good or honest in Mr. Sawicki's opinion, good people can still make mistakes.
What did you consider when you were writing your answer? Check all that apply.
what Mr. Sawicki says
. what other people say
. whether Steve is guilty or innocent
. what Steve has said
Answer:
what Mr. Sawicki says
Explanation:
The answer shown in the text above was created considering only what Mr. Sawicki says about Steve. The answer states that Steve's characterization through what Mr. Sawicki says is not reliable. That's because Mr. Sawicki doesn't know Steve fully and only knows his behavior in one place, at school. Mr. Sawicki does not know anything about Steve and does not even know how he behaves outside of school, so he cannot say that Steve is honest. In other words, Mr. Sawicki's speech is imprecise, it lacks evidence and therefore cannot be trusted.
