Maybe like theres this thing people say oh I just got a chill down my spine they mean that you're reading so intense you're giving yourself chills by it.
Answer:
The sentence that uses a vocabulary word correctly is <em>B</em>: <em>It is only logical that you find out what books you need for the class before purchasing several titles that you might not need.</em>
Explanation:
The second is the right answer because is the one sentence that contains one of the given words -logical- and uses it correctly. The sentence makes sense and the word <em>logical</em> is in the correct verbal tense.
What & When: In 1941, Japan conducted a surprise attack on the U.S. navy base Pearl Harbor killing over 2,000 soldiers.
Cause: Tensions between the U.S. and Japan had been building for years.
Effect: The U.S. entered into WII the next day and defeated the Japanese at Midway.
Significance: Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor caused the U.S. to enter WWII, which would contribute to the downfall of Nazi Germany and other Axis Powers.
Answer:
Japan's spring cherry blossoms often serve as symbols of change or new beginnings in works of Japanese art or literature.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
- Japan's spring cherry blossoms often serve as symbols of change or new beginnings in works of Japanese art or literature.
- Americans appreciate the colorful leaves of fall, but the Japanese view the cherry blossoms of spring as part of their cultures.
In this text, the author explains the importance that cherry blossoms have on Japanese culture. He tells us that the Japanese give cherry blossoms a very special place in their culture. They believe these to be an essential part of Japan, and they celebrate them in poetry, paintings and tea ceremonies. Moreover, Japanese cherry blossoms are considered to represent change, beauty and new beginnings.
Hello. You did not provide the article to which this question is related. However, when researching your question on the internet, I was able to find a question exactly the same as yours that shows that the question refers to the article "Proposed Treatment to Fix Genetic Diseases Raises Ethical Issues" that shows the attempt of scientists to legally approve the practices to manipulate the DNA present in the maternal egg, to remove possible DNA errors that can cause genetic diseases in babies.
If I were one of the scientists on the team who wants to legalize this practice, I would try to argue against society's concerns about the problems that could arise from this manipulation.
A major concern that people have is that this practice generates "manufactured" babies. I would fight this fear, showing that we would only deal with DNAs that have flaws that can trigger diseases, that is, the modified DNA, would maintain all the characteristics that the baby would normally have, but would only rid him of genetic diseases, which would be very advantageous for the child and the family. This would not create a "manufactured" baby, nor would it cause any adverse reaction to the child or the mother.
In addition, this practice would be performed on very few women, as 1 in 200 women have DNA defects. This shows that this practice would only be used in cases of need and these cases would be very few.