Although Cory is rich and of an elite class, he kills himself because he is unhappy.
The poem begins describing Richard Cory as a rich gentleman. The speaker of the poem is one of the townspeople and he says, "we thought that he was everything to make us wish that we were in his place." This envy from the townspeople does not cost him his life. But it surprises the townspeople because they thought they wanted to be him, however, they do not want to be dead like Cory is at the end of the poem. It is ironic because his unhappiness is unexpected since he came across as though he was happy because of his money.
Positive; he states that the polices were 'good,' instead of just what they were.
B. False.
In spite of its stellar cast and renown writers, <em>Casablanca</em>'s producers did not expect it to receive any brighter success than other Hollywood films of the year (1942-43).
The budget, a bit over 1 million dollars, was not extraordinarily high.
Upon release, it was actually censored in several regions of the world:
- it was banned in North Africa, where it was believed to risk stirring up tensions among Vichy regime supporters,
- it was banned and recut in Ireland, because the evil portrayal of Germany and Nazi-occupied France was interpreted as against the principle of wartime neutrality.
Yet <em>Casablanca</em> received great reviews, was a box-office success, and won 3 Oscars in at the 16th Academy Awards ceremony in 1944: one for Best Picture, another for Best Director for Michael Curtiz, and another for Best Adapted Screenplay for the brothers Epstein and Howard Koch. What's more, it has made its imprint on popular culture by becoming a cult movie, thanks to its memorable characters, lines, and music.
This is a very debatable question, therefore, it is an opinion. Despite the fact that the picture frequently speaks to unlawful discourse of yelling ' flame' in a swarmed theater alludes to an obsolete lawful standard. At a certain point, the law criminalized such discourse, which made an "unmistakable and current hazard." It should specifically urge others to carry out particular criminal activities they could call their own. The thought of dishonestly yelling "flame" in a swarmed theater emerged from the Preeminent Court's 1919 choice for the situation of Schenck v. United States. The Court decided consistently that the First Alteration, however it ensures flexibility of expression, does not secure perilous discourse. The case being referred to did not include flames, theaters or being frenzy. This is my own opinion.
Answer:
oooooooooooooodhhxizhsjsijshz