The only one that makes kind of sense is vigil. While a vigil is usually a more serious event, it also usually involves staying up late with lights and bringing attention to a specific event or cause.
Answer:
B. Henry Taylor's article keeps saying that Victor Hugo was against
Napoleon, but he never backs it up.
Explanation:
A credible source is an information source that is unbiased, trustworthy and reliable. Also, a credible source is typically backed up by evidence from various information channels and should be accurate.
In order to validate a credible source, it is necessary to ensure that the information provided is checked against other reliable sources to verify its level of accuracy.
As a rule, any credible information source should have multiple ways to validate the informations being presented i.e it should be factually backed up with evidence.
In a group discussion, the best example of challenging the credibility of a source would be; Henry Taylor's article keeps saying that Victor Hugo was against Napoleon, but he never backs it up. Henry's article isn't credible because it isn't backed up with any evidence or source to validate the claim that Victor Hugo was against Napoleon.
Answer:
Explanation:
this is really confusing. . . .. . . . um "trying to start war" / "giving secrets away, so the dialogue?
If half a pound is worth 3$ per package, that means that a full pound of fish is 6$ when there is a 50% discount. Which means, when there is not, the full price would be twice as much, 12$.
Answer:
Those from the North generally opposed slavery in Kansas. Election fraud, intimidation, and some violence resulted, when the two sides began to contest the territory. ... The turmoil in Kansas contributed to the growing tension between the North and the South, which eventually led to the outbreak of the Civil War.
Explanation:
Thats what i got chief soo hoped this helped...
