Frankl reacted to his Holocaust experience by theorizing that the most important thing in life is not to find happiness but to find meaning. This relates to Elie Wiesel's reaction to what he went through in Night in that Wiesel drew from those negative experiences. They are what influenced to him not to be a bystander, what influenced him to speak out on the perils of indifference. I think Wiesel would agree with Frankl's approach to life, as it seems that beating indifference and helping someone else can be synonymous with finding meaning in your life. However, I think his qualification would be that meaning leads to happiness, both for the person who is finding meaning and the person who is benefiting from the other's search for meaning.
The words can be used in a fictional novel or narrative.
laws by definition is commonly understood as a system of rules that are created and enforced through social or governmental institutions to regulate conduct, therefore it sets a certian standard of the freedom that a person can have. with out laws that freedom goes unchecked and as history shows us, no place can function properly without a couple rules in place. unchecked freedom is just as dangerous as no freedom because without they both damage the stability of a place or region. some people agree that "where there is no law, there is no freedom" because the law allows people to appreciate freedom in the first place.
hope this helps, plz vote me the brainliest :)
1. I would say the first one is personification because it refers to the night as "bitter," or giving an inhuman thing human qualities.
2. This is an example of a pun. It's a play on words between "photographic" and "developed."
Answer:
Explanation:
If a dependent marker word is used, the clause cannot stand alone as a complete sentence. For example: "If she leaves" = not a complete sentence. If an independent marker word is used, the clause can stand alone as a complete sentence. For example: "Therefore, she leaves" = a complete sentence.