Let's start with an obvious one. He certainly is not a coward. He was willing to take on a dog that was ferocious; in contrast, Heathcliff makes the comment that the "cowardly children also crept forward..." That quoted phrase is somewhere near the very end.
Your first example of yellow underlining is a wonderful example. Heathcliff is quite common and he would use common English. He characterizes Cathy as being gentile and not given to saying anything contrary to her upbringing.
I would note that Heathcliff followed grumbling execrations and vengeance. [an execration is a threat denouncement or curse. Again Heathcliff is showing his common upbringing. Cathy would choke before she would utter such things. This one is kind of iffy. You could omit it. It is by inference something that shows that Heathcliff is different].
Your second underlined statement is correct. It characterizes Heathcliff as a robber and a thief and part of a lowlife gang. You could go on. Robert does not hesitate to make his feelings known and adds to what you underlined.
Your third underlined statement is correct as well. I have added two but your examples are fine.
Who marks this? Make an appeal if you get it wrong. Interpreting literature is that way. This is not exactly a factual question and the only way to answer it is to compare Heathcliff to someone else. I chose Robert and Cathy. Write your instructor and provide some of the evidence you have provided here.
There is not much detail to answer your question. What story!?
Answer:
Collective noun
Explanation:
A collective noun is a word which we use to define a group or collection of people, animals or things. In the phrase a herd of elephants, the word herd is a collective noun.
Answer:
A proper version of this text would be the following.
"The reporter failed to notice the discrepancies in the report that the congressmen had presented because him and his staff successfully diverted the media's attention to other issues"
Explanation:
The use of the past perfect indicates a past action which happened before another past action. In this way, it helps us organize the different events that took place. First, the congressmen presented the report, later on, the reporter failed to notice the discrepancies in it. On the other hand, "him" is the subject of the sentence and "his" in "his staff" is a possesive pronoun. In this case, the subject must always go in the first place and the possesive pronoun in the second place.