Sure! So, for starters, you want to compare and contrast two things that are similar, not very different. For example, you would compare and contrast reading a book to listening to an e-book, and you would not compare and contrast reading a book to ridding a bus.
so, for an example of this:
Reading a book is the same as listening to an e-book because both ways you are getting the same information. Reading a book and listening to an e-book are different because reading needs, you guessed it, reading, but you don't need to read to listen to an e-book.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The cultural distinction seen in the given scenario is context.
Explanation:
Wade clearly comes from a low-context culture, which means he is not used to implicit meanings that have to be interpreted according to the context. Wade is used to things being said straightforwardly, to information being conveyed through words. However, he is now inserted in a high-context culture. High-context cultures value the collective more than the individual. That means people in such cultures are more careful with their words, communicating widely through the use of contextual elements such as body language, tone of voice, gestures etc. It is important to note, however, that no one country shows only one type of culture. The United States, for instance, is generally a low-context country, but some situations - such as family gatherings - are high-context.
Answer: 'must' and 'not'
Explanation: must+not=musn't
Ex: You musn't do that.
Answer: C.. it was set in the past
Explanation:
Just did it on a pe x