The answer is C. That a government is best when it does not interfere with the lives of individuals
Answer:
B: Tracing a sequence of events resulting in a positive outcome
Explanation:
(AP Classroom) Correct. Writers frequently use certain recognizable approaches to develop and organize the reasoning of their arguments. In the opening lines of the passage, the author employs such a method of development when he traces a sequence of events that he believes have culminated in a positive outcome: the First World War happened; the war provided a cautionary example; world leaders have been trying to prevent another outbreak of war; in the end, they succeed in devising the “greatest preventive measures ever adopted by nations.” A method of development provides an audience with the means to trace a writer’s reasoning in an argument. In this case, the author’s approach to organizing his argument suggests that he understands recent peace preservation efforts in terms of a temporal chain of events—one in which each event is linked to the next by a causal logic.
First of all, it is important to define adjective phrase in order to find our answer. It is a group of words that describe a noun or a pronoun. So option A (curly-haired Bob played a game because the "curly- haired" is an adjective phrase that modifies the noun Bob. The other possibilities do not show a group of words with adjectival reference that might define a noun or pronoun.
If someone is seein information from one side, they may be more persuaded to believe what that side is saying, especially if the other side does not provide a persuasive argument or stance. If someone is watching something and it focuses on one side of the story without evidence from the other side, they will most likely tend to believe that side. That is what I saw tied together in these statements :)