(<span>characteristics of a two-party system)
I believe that a (2) party system would be a lot better. The reason to why I would think this would be because when having two parties, arguments would come more clear.
</span><span>(characteristics of a multiparty system)
I feel like have multiple of systems would be just to many. In my opinion, 2 is just perfect, and having any more would just be to many, to many different thoughts all in 1. So,that would be why I think multiple systems would be to much.
(</span><span>advantages and disadvantages of a coalition government)
This would be very risky because once the settlement has been made, there would have to take some time to take back this law or what ever has been made.
_________________________________________________________
So, when having a (first party) system, this would be very different as when having two. The reason this would be would be mainly because it's only 1, and one would be very easy to make laws and different choices, and because of this, they have considered to make 2.
</span><span>
</span>
The ACS (American Cancer Society) was founded by businessmen and doctors.
In this case, parenthesis were used clarify or add information about the meaning of the initials “ACS”. If the information within parenthesis is deleted, the meaning of the sentence will not change.
The example sentence does not need additional punctuation marks such as brackets or commas to clarify its meaning.
What story or piece of writing is this question based on?
The coach said there a scholarship for studants that win so mayza went to practice with her friend