Hello. You have not submitted the texts to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for them to be compared. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
Your question shows that the two texts are different and present similar ideas. This presentation of ideas is made based on the evidence and supporting details that the texts present. Both the evidence and the supporting details are placed in a text to prove and justify the ideas and arguments presented, showing that these ideas and arguments are real and true. In this way, you can show the similarities that these texts have through the evidence and details of support that they have in common and are related to the ideas and arguments they promote. To present the differences between the texts, you must show the evidence and supporting details that are different between the two texts, but that are also related to the same ideas and arguments.
Hello!
I'm pretty sure the answer is C. Introduce new facts in support of an argument not yet established.
I hope this is correct! :)
In MLA when you need to create an in-text citation of a paraphrase, it is necessary to indicate the source by including the author and the page number. Since you did not include the author of the article or any passage to cite specifically, here are some formats you could follow:
According to <em>name of the author</em>, "passage in quotations" (<em>56</em>).
"Passage in quotations" (<em>name of author 56</em>).
Essentially, you need to include the passage in quotations and can add whatever else you need to to your sentence. In the first format, you include the author's name within the sentence, so you don't need to include it at the end. The rest of the information, like the title of the article or the date it was published does not need to be included in an in-text citation, but must be included in your reference list.
Answer:
Rainsford has a history of sleep problems.
Explanation:
Correct me if I am wrong.