<span>There
are a couple of reasons why Sentence 4 should be removed. First, the way the sentence reads is that of
a final sentence by the way it insinuates there is nothing left to say. Thus, when the next sentence begins with
additional information, it seems counter to the final/ending sentiment that Sentence
4 communicates. Additionally, the phrase
“It is clear” could be offensive to some readers because if it is clear, then
why did things need explaining to begin with. As such, some readers may feel insulted. It is for these two reasons that Sentence 4’s
omission would benefit this conclusion.</span>
Answer: the author compares baxters lack of experience in politics to that of a driver without a license (B) edge
Explanation:
Answer:
B. For instance
Explanation:
For instance, a company that decides to fire workers may talk of the need for "re-engineering," "restructuring," or "downsizing" its workforce.
The above sentence actually addresses what No. 1 and No. 2 sentences were talking about. This gives an example of what doublespeak truly means. The company have decided to fire workers but they make it look like it is restructuring they are carrying out. So in order to confuse the workers or make their action mild, they attribute it to "restructuring", "re-engineering"
The answer is Challenge.
Thus, challenge is a 9 letters <span>noun </span><span>to be called to take part in a contest.</span>
I believe the answer is A.
b. is a prepositional phrase
d. is a complete noun phrase
and I think c. is a verb phrase
