Answer:
The statement that best describes how the pipe player influenced Caesar's crossing of the Rubicon is:
"Take we the course which the signs of the gods and the false dealing of our foes point out. The die is cast.”
Explanation:
Crossing the Rubicon was historically symbolic. While it violated an ancient Roman tradition and decree that forbade any provincial governor from crossing the small river which separated Italy from France (or more specifically the province of the Gaul), it afforded Caesar the chance he had strategized and waited for to become a Roman maximum ruler and conqueror. So, Julius Caesar seizing the moment provided by the example of the god-like human who suddenly appeared before him playing a flute, crossed the Rubicon on January 10-11, 49 B.C. This marked a point of no-return to normalcy. So, following the footsteps of the god, i.e. the figure who crossed the stream with his war-like songs, Caesar decided ultimately to violate the orders of the Roman Senate because he strongly believed that the gods had given him the go-ahead to cross the Rubicon and make war on Rome. The rest, as they say, is history. And the die is always cast when someone decides to cross the Rubicon.
Answer:
Too much pride can lead to conflict with others.
Explanation:
I took the quiz. I hope this helps :)
Answer:
Option "E" is correct
Explanation:
Quoting a person with evident experience in the academic field will be an educational testimony.
Answer:
hypothesis: Amount of sugar ingested affects children's self-esteem.
Explanation:
To establish the validity or falsifiability of this hypothesis, it would be necessary to establish a scientific experiment.
In that case, I would gather 30 children between 10-12 years old and divide them into 3 groups, each with 10 children. Group A would be made up of children who should eat 100 calories (approximately 25 grams) of sugar per day, which is the limit recommended by medical authorities. Group B would be formed by children who should eat 150 calories of sugar per day. Group C would consist of children who would not eat any calories from sugar. The experiment would last for 3 months.
Over the three months, children would be assessed on their view of themselves and their confidence in going through small challenges that require high levels of self-esteem. Each children's behavior would be given a grade.
In the end, the scores in each group would form an average and these averages would be compared using statistisc apps, to see if there is a significant difference between the results of each group. If the difference was not significant between the groups, it means that sugar does not interfere with children's self-esteem. If the difference is significant, it means that sugar interferes with children's self-esteem.