This question is incomplete. Here is the complete question:
Read this thesis statement: "<em>Heart of Darkness</em> plunges the narrator into the depths of the Congo." What is wrong with it?:
A) It is too narrow.
B) It is a plot summary.
C) It is too obvious.
D) It is not supported by the text.
Answer:
The correct answer is option A) It is too narrow.
Explanation:
As we know, this story is narrated by the protagonist, Charlie Marlow, who tells us of the journey he made going up a tropical river to locate a certain Kurtz, an elusive and legendary explorer who, according to his superiors, seems to have entrenched himself deep inside from the jungle. Soon the journey turns into a multi-troubled journey, with mystery and degradation growing as the legend of Lord Kurtz enlarges and takes shape.
The novel is based on a true story in the life of Conrad, who sailed up the Congo River as a ship captain in 1890 while working for the SGB company. There, amid the exploitation and genocide that the settlers carried out in the Congo Free State - the private preserve of King Leopold II of Belgium - Conrad was truly traumatized, wanting to relate the horror of his experience in a book in which, on the other hand, and despite the parallels between author and protagonist, no real places or characters are mentioned.
Just using the phrase<em> "plunges the narrator into the depths of the Congo"</em> is too vague to describe the actual plot. Therefore, answer A is correct.
Eraser tattoo is a short story by Jason Reynolds about the teenage love of Dante and Shay. Dante has loved Shay since childhood.
<h3>Who are Dante and Shay?</h3>
Shay is the main character of the story and loves Dante as much as he loves her back. She wanted her initial to be tattooed on Dante to show his love.
Shay wanted to marine biologist and Dante wanted to build bridges that make them move away from each other which affects their relationship. Dante is so in love with her that he agrees to get the tattoo.
Therefore, option B. Dante loved Shay since childhood.
Learn more about eraser tattoo here:
brainly.com/question/26863438
#SPJ1
Well, this question doesn't make that much sense. I think its missing some information.
Answer:
“The animals were shocked beyond measure to learn that even Snowball could be guilty of such an action.”
“Almost immediately the footprints of a pig were discovered in the grass.”
“Napoleon snuffed deeply at them and pronounced them to be Snowball's.”
Explanation:
Napoleon planned to have a control on the animals of the Anima Farm and therefore accused Snowball of the destruction. Before all the animas he accused Snowball to be the one who had overthrown the windmill. He blamed Snowball that he had planned to take a revenge on the animals and had taken the advantage of the darkness of night and destroyed their efforts. The animals were very shocked to know that even comrades like Snowball can be such destructive. After finding the footprints, Napoleon was able to make other animals believe on such false allegations.