Answer: So if you had 570 cm of ribbon, then 570%2F8.5=67.05 which means that about 67 students can do the experiment (round down to the nearest whole number).
Explanation: If you had 8.5 cm of ribbon, then only 8.5%2F8.5=1 student can do the experiment. If you had 17 cm of ribbon, then 17%2F8.5=2 students can do the experiment.
Answer and Explanation:
<em>A funnel is in the top of the buret and a beaker is positioned underneath the buret:</em> This is correct and is necessary to fill the buret, but the funnel and the beaker has to be removed before the titration starts. The calculation for moles of analyte does not affect.
<em>A solution is being poured from a bottle into the buret via the funnel:</em> Using a funnel helps to fill the burette but it must be removed to filling the buret at 0.0 mL. In this case, the calculation for moles of analyte do not affect.
<em>Adding titrant past the color change of the analyte solution</em>: In this case, an excess of titrant is added, thus the calculation for moles of anality will be higher than it should be.
<em>Recording the molarity of titrant as 0.1 M rather than its actual value of 0.01 M</em>: In this case, the titrant is considered more concentrated than it is hence, the calculation for moles of anality will be higher than it should be.
<em>Spilling some analyte out of the flask during the titration</em>: The excess of titrant spilled out of the flask higher up the volume of titrant measured. Therefore, the calculation for moles of anality will be higher than it should be.
<em>Starting the titration with air bubbles in the buret</em>: The air inside the burette occupies measured volume, thus the volume of titrant measured will be higher than the real volume spilled in the flask. Hence the calculation for moles of anality will be higher than it should be.
<em>Filling the buret above the 0.0 mL volume mark</em>: Some volume of titrant will be spilled inside the flask but will no be measured since the buret measures the titrant below the 0.0mL mark, thus the calculation for moles of anality will be lower than it should be.
I have no clue honestlly search it up: i found this answer:19<span>.</span>
Answer:
Reduction
Explanation:
Oxidation is a process that involves loss of electrons.
Reduction is a process that involves gain of electrons.
In this equation, the electrons (4e-) are in the reactant side. This means that it is gain of electrons.
The reaction is a reduction reaction.
The answer is convection<span>. The convection force is originated inside the fluid bodies (inside the Earth, in this case) and is due to the difference of densities generated by the difference in temperatures. This is the same force that affects the current of waters and the winds. The mechanism proposed is that the very hot rocks deep in the Earth have a lower density than upper rocks, so those hot rocks (not liquid due to the high pressures) tend to move upward leaving a void. The void will be filled by the next rocks close to the void and that generate a circular pattern that press the rocks to move.</span>
