The correct answer is: Ensure that evidence is reasonable.
A logical fallacy refers to an error done in reasoning which makes an argument invalid. The conclusion of the argument doesn't follow logically from what peceded it.
A simple example would be: The toucan flies. The parrot flies, Therefore all birds fly.
Here we are making an erroneus conclusion by just using two examples to generalize an entire specie. If our evidence was checked in a correct way we would know that penguins or chickens don't fly.
Ensuring that the evidence is reasonable implies a deeper research on the topic and therefore a more complete knowledge about it. It is more probable to avoid making logical fallacies in this way. Empirical data will also help the author developing stronger arguments as they are supported by empirical evidence.
Using only pathos doesn't prevent you from making a logical fallacy, as the arguments to provoke an emotion could be wrong too, failling on it's purpose.
Answer:
3600
Explanation:
1 minute = 60 seconds
Find out how much abusings the child gets in a minute.
2 x 60 = 120
Find out how much the child gets in 30 minutes.
120 x 30 = 3600
Answer:
- "I love to hear her speak
''
- "And yet by heaven, I think my love as rare''
Explanation:
Going by the utterances of the speaker in this sonnet, one can tell that the speaker's mistress is not overly attractive but he still loves to hear her speak and has a rare love for her.
This shows the seriousness of the sonnet because it shows that the speaker was able to look past physical features to like his mistress with a rare love that is not based on physical features and comparisons.
Answer:
i think it is useful because imagine there are too many people in that one area there would have been many problems such as area problem and other problems
Explanation: