Answer:
The correct answer is <u>B</u>: online atlas.
Explanation:
We use an atlas to find different geographical things (e.g. states, cities, seas, oceans, continents, etc.) which represent all the parts of the world in the form of a book. Therefore, if you want to find the geographic location of China, you should find the answer in an atlas.
On the other hand, an almanac represents a collection of different annual publications or events.
We use a dictionary to find a meaning of the words, the scope of its use, synonyms, antonyms, etc.
Encyclopedia represents is a book which contains general knowledge information about different things and topics.
The one that would not be considered external conflict would be D
I would always advise my friend that it is necessary to study all subjects in depth and perform well in the examinations to enable him to carry out higher studies in order to have a stable working career. But, at the same time, I'd advise him that merely obtaining good marks is not the barometer of gaining knowledge. Attaining knowledge on diverse things is most important for a human person.
My advice to my friend would be acquiring knowledge by reading books on diverse subjects, learning about various matters by watching television channels like National Geographic, History Channel, Travel & Living and so on. But, first of all, he should know most things about his own country. With the advent of the internet and satellite television, gathering knowledge has become easy; he should make use of these facilities.
Even for passing examinations, he must read and understand the various subjects and topics rather than learn by rote, simply memorising without understanding is not good. <span><span>Comments </span> <span>Report</span></span>
If we were writing a persuasive piece, the "least to most" arrangement can be used. This is used as a structural design of your essay that ties in well with the thesis. Even though I don't typically like it, it is commonly taught and often expressed as the best structure to use.
The "least to most" arrangement manages to catch the reader's attention with the least "important" evidence before going into depth and detail about your ideas and argument. Analogically speaking, it can be referred to as a hill. The bottom segment accounts for the least important details of your argument, and each step you take, you dive deeper in your analysis/idea, until you reach the top, where you should have already persuaded the marker/reader.
False is the answer to this question.