I'd say the answer is B, people are victims of circumstances. The lieutenant was shot and had to have his arm amputated. It isn't specified what the battle was about or what side he was on so we can't say it is A or C because it takes those certain details to come to the conclusions that people get what they deserve and good triumphs evil. Moreover, people cannot control what happens to them as we saw. The lieutenant got shot, something he wasn't controlling, and he had his arm amputated, something he clearly objected to but still had done. He had absolutely no control of anything throughout the story. Therefore, the only logical answer would be B
hiiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiiiiiiiiiiiii
Answer:
Thoreau's usage of several rhetorical questions upon one another helps eloquently establish a rhythm to present similar, but different argumentative key points. Moreover, it gives a rhythm to the text right off the start. Ultimately, it enables him to set up his argument against morals and values that he claims are being controlled by the government, and as well setting an argument for individualism.
Explanation:
The author does not make many direct statements; however, he does use the device of rhetorical questions that are meant to not be answered by neither the reader nor the text.
Answer:
Readers learn, along with Laurie's mother, that Laurie is the boy causing trouble.
Explanation:
What movie was that I can’t see
