You already answered the question. The claim is you shouldn’t talk to strangers. The support theme shows that in the evidence because little red riding was too trusting of the wolf, the “stranger” she ended up putting her grandmother and herself in danger.
One evening I was walking toward the edge of the lake in a swirling snowstorm. I was all alone. I couldn't see very far ahead. All of a sudden, I heard the hoot of an owl, I think. I jumped at the sudden noise, checking my surroundings in a spontaneous fear of something watching me. Then, I shuttered in fear. My gaze was locked toward two big yellow eyes. I..I couldn't speak. I just watched it. It stayed there for a bit, watching me. Suddenly, it lifted up in a fast motion and went up the trees. Fight or flight kicked in, and I ran back home. By the time I made it, my legs were sore and it was 4:32 PM. I shrugged it off as an owl just coming out to find food. Even though it was the middle of winter..during a snowstorm..when it should be hibernating- What am I talking about?
Monsters don't exist! ...
R-Right?
it’s pretty simple, just put as the title, pros and cons of a phone, and then define what a cellphone is and then say what its used for, and then say what the problem is from your point of view and then list your first pro from the table u have, and then put your con and put a transition word (like then, or next) and then put what you think about the issue and lastly, just restate your issue in your conclusion.
hope this helps!
I believe that writers are definitely justified in challenging the artistic status quo, because that's what true artists do. But to answer the question of why they do it, there are more answers. Think of Emily Dickinson, for example. She always strongly stood by her own freedoms and decisions to go against the current, and she's one of the most famous of American writers because of it. Aside from the fact she wanted to, going against the norm for writers often gives them more attention than if they wrote what was "expected" at the time. When studying famous American writers, we are often told to study things that they did differently than most, some, mostly the less notable today, only had minor differences, like they made their stories from different tenses, etc. But the most notorious used themes that may have been taboo and writing styles even more diverse. There is always the counter culture and most writers that we study belonged to it, sick of the large amount of similar, traditional stories that lacked element, or simply wanted to stand out.
Another reason could be that writers wanted to spread the written word to all different kinds of things that have yet to be written about, different characters that haven't yet been discovered. And there are the related reasons like how writers didn't even know they were writing for the public, only time tells, like with Ann Frank. She wasn't afraid to put opinions down on paper because it was her own personal journal but it had become a famous piece of literature because of the opinions.
I think writers break from tradition because the traditions are often not realistic and these artists are the only ones who will tell the truth, and that is why they do it, and that is why they are so important.