Both winners and losers have motivation and are courageous ; both have attempted something, even if they didn't win. Hope this helps! :)<span />
answer: The author adds an unexpected twist at the end when Mateo texts Bella.
I got it right. :)
Answer:
The correct answer is option C. The sergeant has to discipline Private Roe, but he doesn't want to.
Explanation:
Of all the available options, the one that generates the most conflict is option C.
As we can see, in the other options good things happen that do not present any type of problem. However, in option C we see that the sergeant has to do something he does not want to do. This indicates that the story will unfold based on this conflict.
Given this information we can say that the correct answer is option C.
Answer:
In the research paper, the sentence below is plagiarized.
"Going Green" means practicing an environmentally friendly and ecologically responsible lifestyle as well as making decisions to help protect the environment and sustain natural resources.
Explanation:
First, I had to rearrange the write up properly as seen below.
"Going Green" means practicing an environmentally friendly and ecologically responsible lifestyle as well as making decisions to help protect the environment and sustain natural resources. There are lots of reasons to consider going green - too much trash, greenhouse gases, air and water pollution, damage to the ozone layer, and saving money. As a result of my research, I believe that we should all do our part to protect the environment. Too much trash is one reason for environmental pollution, according to USA gov, the US government's official Web portal.
The writer started the write up by technically defining the term "going green" as seen below.
"Going Green" means practicing an environmentally friendly and ecologically responsible lifestyle as well as making decisions to help protect the environment and sustain natural resources.
This technical definition is almost certainly gotten from her research, and the author is not stated. This is a clear case of plagiarism, unlike at the last sentence of the write up where she cited the US governments's official portal for a fact used in that last sentence of the write up.
Please show the question you dont understand or you dont know