<u>Answer:</u>
A: It serves as a complicating incident because it leads Mathilde to borrow the infamous necklace.
This statement best analyzes how this conflict develops the plot
<u>Explanation</u>:
The story "The Necklace" by “Guy de Maupassant” narrates a story of a woman who always wants to compete with her neighbours and friends and how this leads to her downfall. Mathilde Loisel is the protagonist of the story. She is a greedy and a mean lady.
When she was invited to a party, she brought a new dress appropriate for that party as she did not have a suitable dress. Also, she borrowed a matching necklace from her friend, Mrs. Jeanne Forestier. But Mathilde lost the necklace and the story unfolds that how she replaces the necklace with a fake one. Thus, option A is the correct answer of the given conflict which develops a new plot in the story.
Good God ummm I think it might be B. One can assume that she hates Tybalt right about now since he tried to kill Romeo or he murdered Romeos BFF and you can also see that she doesnt seem to mad at the fact that Romeo killed him. She seems more mad at the fact that Romeo is banished. So shes basically throwing her cousins death out the window for her love so I would label this as Love and death. I my be wrong though so if I am then i'm sorry. I havent really read Shakesphere yet so i'm just going off of google and the excerpt that you put up and I could honestly find all 4 choices in the poem so yea Good Luck.
"Though we were the closest thing Pranab Kaku had to a family that day, we were not included in the group photographs that were taken on the grounds of the country club, with Deborah's parents and grandparents and her many siblings" &" Deborah had made sure that my parents, who did not eat beef, were given fish instead of filet mignon like everyone else<span>."</span>
Answer:
You need to understand the train of thoughts of what your feeling inside of you with practicing letters and writing things it'll be apart of your life in the future.
Explanation:
Answer:
by helping some animals recover, the DESA might put some other animals in danger
Explanation:
in the text, some animals like the owl and the wold recovered from extinction but some farmers and the DESA might need to put them in danger because in the owl P.O.V, the farmers need to do their job of cutting trees or they will not have any job, and that will be a problem, in the wolf P.O.V they need to put the wolf in danger or the wolf will attack the other animals in the farm.
hoped this helped :)