There is not a true resolution by the end of Hamlet . Hamlet's main conflict is internal because he cannot make decisions. There are three big conflicts: his nation is under attack; his family is undergoing a crisis and he feels really unhappy. Therefore, Hamlet does not know if we have to act upon our fate or if we have to act out of free will: Are we responsible for our fate or our fate is conditioned by free will? This conflict is not solved. Hamlet's attitude in the final scence is different from the previous scenes since he does not want to take revenge against his father's murderer, Claudius, and he feels sorry for Laertes. Hamlet killed Laertes' father and now he would like to make peace with him. In spite of these decisions, Hamlet still feels unhappy. Hamlet has not been able to resolve the conflict between thought and action. He is still unhappy and has got a lot of doubt. This is the reason why everything goes wrong and tragic by the end of the play. Although Hamlet wants to make peace with Laertes, they get into a "fight" and Hamlet kills Laertes with his poisoned sword. Laertes' sword is poisoned because Claudius and he plotted against Hamlet. They want to kill Hamlet so they organised a fencing competition. They had poisoned the swords and the cup Hamlet would drink after each point he scores in the competition. By accident, Laertes is killed and Gertrude drinks the poisoned cup. Hamlet gets really desperate and he finally kills Claudius with the poisoned sword . Hamlet also dies because he was previously wounded by Laertes.
Answer:
Tom should knock on their door and ask or if Tom has their number text/call and ask how they are feeling.
India India is also the king of cricket
Which sentence best serves as the missing claim in this paragraph?
A- One important Supreme Court case about freedom of speech is Tinker v. Des Moines.
B- We really don’t have the right to freedom of speech, and this theory has been supported throughout history.
C- The First Amendment right to freedom of speech and the right to protest peacefully are rights that must be protected.
The best options are A and C, nevertheless, the option A is just another example of what a peaceful protest can achieve. Tinker v. Des Moines and some friends decided to wear black bracelets at school as a way to protest against the Vietnam war, the school made the stop that protest by not letting them go to classes so they decided to wear black clothes the whole year. The school presented the case in the court but, guess what ? the kids won!! The Court ruled that the First Amendment applied to public schools, and school officials could not censor student discourse unless it disrupted the educational process.
As a claim missing in this text is the fact that the freedom of speech is our right and can't be censored !! That's the claim. The First Amendment right to freedom of speech and the right to protest peacefully are rights that must be protected. Option A serves as an argument to this claim.