It contains specific, credible evidence but uses a disrespectful tone that should be edited.
The argument has valid points such as the use of educational apps, but calls anyone opposing it names such as naive. If they took out that part, and improved the tone at the bottom a bit, the author would sound more mature and composed. Hope this helps!
Both authors refer to different levels of human needs. Remember that Maslow represented them in a pyramid named "Maslow Hierarchy of Needs". As you know, in a pyramidal representation, you need to fulfill the levels from the bottom to the top. In this case, by completing the levels, a human can achieve self-actualization. Here Maslow refers to the lowest level or the physiological needs (air, water, food, shelter, sleep, clothing, reproduction), without these, a human wont be able to focus on other aspects of his life, as he needs these to survive. When having an empty stomach, the only thing you can think of is eating and you will put all you efford into getting food.
Dostoevsky says that although someone can fulfill his basic needs and climb trough this pyramid, without some goals in his life, the human would feel empty. This is what is expressed when people say "money doesn't buy happiness". Humans need something to live for as we know we are finite and our existense will come to an end.
It would be A. The Dallas Cowboys uniform colors are gray and blue.
The other statements are subjective
He is the man responsible for the plague. He stricken Thebes. Hope this answers your question.