1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kati45 [8]
4 years ago
11

The number of angles in a triangles is a variable ..true / false?

Mathematics
1 answer:
vazorg [7]4 years ago
6 0
First, a short lesson:
tri: three
angle: angle
triangle: 3 angles
a triangle is defined as a closed polygon that has 3 angles

a variable is something that is subject to change
 a triangle always has to have 3 angles so the number of angles is NOT subject to change

false
You might be interested in
Solve the inequality.
geniusboy [140]

Answer:

x>19 represents ghe solution

3 0
4 years ago
The scuba club has 44 members 20 girls and 24 boys what is the ratio of girls to boys in the scuba club
Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

  5 : 6

Step-by-step explanation:

The ratio is ...

  girls : boys = 20 : 24

By removing a common factor of 4 from each of these numbers, the ratio can be reduced to lowest terms:

  girls : boys = 5 : 6

4 0
3 years ago
Need help pls
aalyn [17]
So, taking 149.98 and subtracting the non-taxable total, 26.95, you are left with 123.03, which to equal 10.07 would have to be multiplied by 0.0819, hence the sales tax is 0.0819.
6 0
3 years ago
There are 5 comedy, 8 action, and 11 children DVDs on a rack. Susan randomly selects 3 of them. What is the probability that she
ipn [44]
|\Omega|=24\cdot23\cdot22=12144\\
|A|=5\cdot8\cdot11=440\\\\
P(A)=\dfrac{440}{12144}=\dfrac{5}{138}
5 0
3 years ago
1. According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, the breast cancer rate for women has decreased at 0.9% per year b
jeka94

Answer:

a. 199,389

b. b. From the part A, the question suggests a 0.9% yearly decrease which amounts to 199,389. This answer does not correspond to their recorded figure because the 0.9% decrease was just an average taken over the period. There could be years that the decrease was way smaller than the recorded average, thus using average may not be a good way for calculating population decrease over a period of time.

Step-by-step explanation:

a. Population in 2009 = 192,370

This means that in 2005 the population = 192,370 x 1.009 x 1.009 x 1.009 x 1.009 = 199,389

b. From the part A, the question suggests a 0.9% yearly decrease which amounts to 199,389. This answer does not correspond to their recorded figure because the 0.9% decrease was just an average taken over the period. There could be years that the decrease was way smaller than the recorded average, thus using average may not be a good way for calculating population decrease over a period of time.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Joe walks 3 miles east and then 1/2 mile west. It took him an hour, what was his average speed?
    5·1 answer
  • List the sides of triangle ABC in order from least to greatest
    6·2 answers
  • Would a reflection followed by a dilation be similar, congruent, or both?
    6·1 answer
  • A building has an entry with the shape of a parabolic arch 66 feet high and 46 feet wide at the base. Find an equation for the p
    5·1 answer
  • Two resistors have the values as given, R1 = 110Ω, and R2 = 560Ω. Find the equivalent resistance when the two resistors are in s
    5·1 answer
  • What is another name for AC
    8·2 answers
  • Use the unit circle to find the following values.
    14·1 answer
  • PLZZZ HELPPPP
    13·1 answer
  • If the measure of XWZ = 127 . What is the measure of YWV?
    6·1 answer
  • Write the expression in exponential form
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!